They run 3 coal fired power plants in the Milwaukee metropolitan area which contribute 12 million metric tons of greenhouse gases. This information was compiled using the Facility Level Information on Greenhouse Gases Tool located at: http://ghgdata.epa.gov/ghgp/main.do
![]() |
| Valley Power Plant |
There is no doubt Milwaukeeans suffer from poor air quality. With air advisories and ozone days, attempts are being made to ameliorate these issues. Yet it seems there is no sense of partnership with WE energies. Coal fired plants exist in Oak Creek, Milwaukee, Wauwatosa, and Germantown. The Valley power plant is one of the last remaining power plants in the country without modern pollution controls. Fortunately, a citizens group for the area called "Cleaner Valley Coalition" has put pressure on the company, enough so that they are converting the power plant to natural gas. Don't assume this move is entirely altruistic though. WE energies ratepayers will be stuck with the bill. Stakeholders always act in self interest. The move to natural gas was probably necessary for the state to meet new EPA air quality standards.
Good environment is supposed to be good business( Evans,2012), but renewable energy threatens the business models of power companies, and they haven't exactly played nice, Policy implementation and development occurs in close alignment with industry (Evans, 2012) and they have used there influence to keep the status quo in regards to Milwaukee air quality. It seems they take a paternalistic viewpoint in regards to engaging the community as a fellow stakeholder.
If you are interested more in the involvement of WE Energies on local policy, a group called Citizen Utility Board is an activist group that represents residential and small business owners against the utility. The website is www.wiscub.org


The behavior of WE Energies really illustrates the difference between a real and true public utility and a business filling the role of a utility. They function with their profits first in mind, and the continued hegemony of their business model is not far behind. More unsustainable growth (as in urban sprawl etc) means more electricity and gas usage, more cars, more habitat replacement, more pollution and, ultimately, more revenue. Business instead of stewardship.
ReplyDeleteFrom my understanding of this post it seems that the lobbying efforts of WEC are driven entirely by self-interest. When you gave the examples of the utility replacement costs for the street car, what exactly does that mean? Another question, by rate restructuring cases that discourage solar power, does this mean that they are lobbying against solar or trying to fight against cases that discourage it? Because they are motivated by self interest I would guess that it means they are lobbying against solar power because it would compete with their revenue.
ReplyDelete